.

Opponents File Petitions Against Proposed SSA

City staff must validate the petitions before presenting them to City Council.

The fate of the  hangs in the balance after more than half the downtown property owners and business leaders that would be affected by a new Special Service Area filed petitions Friday opposing its creation.

The taxes generated from the proposed SSA are slated to fund DWA promotional efforts to market downtown Wheaton for the next seven years, the duration of the SSA. Without those tax dollars, Keven Graham, past president of the DWA, said the organization . Right now though, Graham said Monday that the only thing his organization can do is wait and see if the petitions are validated and await the decision of the Wheaton City Council.

According to the statutes governing Special Service Areas, opponents of the plan who reside in, own property in or are taxpayers in the proposed district may automatically defeat the proposal if 51 percent file valid written objections to the city clerk by the end of a 60-day filing period. If that criteria is met, the SSA cannot be established for a minimum of two years.

On Friday opponents of the proposed SSA turned in more than 100 petitions from property owners and business proprietors. Out of approximately 150 properties in the proposed area, 86 property owners filed petitions, said Assistant City Manager Mike Dzugan. Out of 55 electors, or proprietors renting property, 28 filed petitions.

Although numerous business leaders supported the SSA during an October public hearing, Graham would not comment on the number of petitions filed Friday or what that could mean as far as support for the DWA. 

Dzugan said the city attorney will carefully examine the petitions to make sure they have been filled out correctly and are valid. They will then review the petitions and make a recommendation to the City Council, which could vote on the new SSA Monday night.

Glenn Kosirog, an SSA opponent who turned in the petitions Friday afternoon, told Patch the DWA should not be funded through tax dollars. He said many businesses are suffering from the economy and cannot afford another tax. He said the DWA marketing efforts can be shouldered by other existing organizations, including the Wheaton Park District and churches.

“This is one way we can cut corners,” Kosirog said.

Kosirog was also critical of $200,000 currently in the DWA accounts that have not been used for downtown marketing purposes. He said those funds should be redistributed to business and property owners.

However, over the course of the debate some business owners touted the benefits of the DWA marketing efforts. Jill Card, owner of , said she located her shop in Wheaton largely to promote downtown Wheaton. If the DWA were to fold, Card said she would have to think about keeping her business in Wheaton.

Earlier this year SSA #7 was proposed by the to replace SSA #6. Under the new proposal, the DWA would reduce the tax rate from 95 cents per $100 to 45 cents. Under the current 95 cent rate, the city of Wheaton receives 60 percent of the funds and the DWA receives 40. Under the new 45 cent proposal the DWA would directly receive all the funding. DWA officials want to change the funding mechanism because many of the downtown properties are in one of three TIF district and any extra monies generated through property taxes are sent into one of the TIF funds.

Council meets for a planning session at 7 p.m. Monday, Dec. 12.

Bill December 13, 2011 at 12:10 AM
What is the charitable purpose of the Downtown Wheaton Association that qualifies it for not-for-profit status and public funding to achieve thier mission statement?
Lisa December 13, 2011 at 04:35 AM
Bill- maybe check if the DWA is a 501(c) 3 or 501 (c) 6. One is tax deductible and one is not. The DWA is likely a (c)6 like most chambers of commerce.
Keith Reily December 13, 2011 at 05:51 PM
Under the SSA6, each .95 cents was split between the City of Wheaton 60% (.57 cents) and the DWA 40% (.38 cents**). Now the currently proposed SSA7, each .45 cents would be ENTIRELY given to the DWA 100% (.45 cents**). So the "tax" is asking for less is true, however none is being given to our city, it would all be given to the DWA! The DWA is asking for MORE!! MORE than it even has been getting for all of these previous years. MORE!! Why is it when the DWA says jump, the city council blindly says, "How High?" Now mind you when I say city council that equals the; whole city, entire city, border to border city, not just a small section.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »