Holding her makeshift sign made from a manila envelope and marker, Stella Weatherly of Aurora was one of about 30 people participating in the Occupy Naperville protest Saturday morning.
Weatherly’s sign, she admitted, was done very last minute. Weatherly had been following the Occupy Chicago protests, even spending time at the protests in the city. She decided to participate in the Naperville event.
“I’m tired of corporation taking all of our money, basically,” she said. “It’s about time people woke up and realized what is happening in this country.”
Occupy Naperville announced Thursday night it would be gathering Saturday at the corner of Washington Street and Ogden Avenue, marching south along Washington Street and making its way to a gathering point at the intersection of Main Street and Jefferson Avenue in downtown . Though only a small group met to plan the protest, organizers were pleased with the much larger turnout.
The overriding message from the people who came out to protest was that power needs to be returned to the people and that corporations hold too much sway with Congress, the president and politicians.
Chris Romy, a Lisle resident, said she became involved in the movement after learning about the Supreme Court ruling from 2010 that allows a corporation to donate unlimited funds, including undisclosed funding, to anyone it wants.
“I’m here to spread that word,” Romy said. “We thought lobbying was bad before, this is obscene.”
A small group of people gathered at about 10 a.m. on the sidewalk near the PNC Bank. The number of protesters began to build and about 30 people were in attendance as they headed downtown. Participants ranged from families with children to senior citizens, teens to those who were in their 20s.
Wheaton resident Guy Rosenthal said he thought it was a good idea to participate in the protest “to come out and speak our piece."
“I’m a pretty middle of the road political person,” he said. “When did banks get away from the traditional role of keeping money flowing? And, now they are siphoning money from the people. … You can’t legislate morality and banks have gotten away from their very ethical and moral role in our economy.”
The group carried signs with a variety of slogans, such as “a corporation is not a person,” “stop screwing us” and “we are the 99 percent.” Many drivers passing by showed support by honking and giving protesters the thumbs up.
Evelyn Thompson, of Naperville, helped organize the protest. She said she was pleased the group was getting more positive reaction from drivers than negative.
The evolution of the protest was organic, Thompson said. She was tired of watching protests happen in the city and decided to take action to bring the protests closer to home. What was an idea on Monday became a protest by Saturday.
Occupy Naperville participants have said they plan to continue the protests every Saturday until corporate dominance of the government ends.
Occupy Chicago and Occupy Naperville are offshoots of the Occupy Wall Street protest, which began in mid-September with demonstrations and occupation of Zuccotti Park in the Wall Street District of New York City. The occupation is meant to highlight corporate influence on democracy. The protest catch phrase is “We are the 99 percent.”
Steve Alesch, a Warrenville resident and Warrenville Park District trustee, said Naperville was chosen as the location for the protest in part because of the size of the community and the visibility the group would have downtown. Naperville, he said, is a good representative of “any city USA.”
The protest, though, is more than a right or left issue, he said.
“It is completely a bipartisan problem in Congress,” Alesch said. “There are these two parties that are dominated by corporations. … We, the people, are losing control of the government.”
While marching to downtown Naperville, the group encountered more horn honking. Once in downtown, at least one driver yelled at the group, “Get a job you [expletive].” But the group was not discouraged and laughed off the criticism. Many shoppers downtown watched, some seemed confused about what was happening, while others driving or passing by offered cheers and honks of supports.
While downtown, Alesch and others spoke again, taking turns sharing their thoughts. Participants had their individual reasons for participating, but the underlying theme was people need to control the government, not corporations.
“Corporations are necessary and small businesses are important,” Alesch said, “but we don’t want corporations to dominate our government. People should dominate our government.”
Have a good day everyone, time to park myself on the couch and watch some football. :)
Profit doesn't disappear like the libunatics think, it goes back into the system, sometimes in the form of dividends and bond payments, like those that pay for my elderly relatives to live in retirement communities and sometimes in appreciation of stock and assets.
We've heard that before.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_Express The Tea Party Express is a California-based group founded in the summer of 2009 to support the Tea Party movement. Founded as a national bus tour to rally Tea Party activists, the group's leadership also endorses and promotes conservative candidates running for state and federal offices. It was founded as a project of the political action committee Our Country Deserves Better PAC by Republican party members Howard Kaloogian and Sal Russo. According to FEC filings, from July through November 2009, OCDB spent around $1.33 million, and of that sum, $857,122 went to the consulting firm Russo, Marsh, and Rogers. Radio host Mark Williams, the former chairman of the Tea Party Express,was widely denounced in the summer of 2010 for writing a letter in praise of slavery in the voice of "colored people" on his blog. He was forced to resign his Tea Party Express spokesperson position.
Back in June (2009), members of the Tea Party Patriots were batting around ideas for a logo to be used for an upcoming Tea Party protest in Washington on September 12. One Tea Partier sent links to some designs he had made, and other members offered positive and negative feedback. But the discussion was soon cut short by Amy Kremer, the Tea Party Patriot national coordinator who last month refused to condemn racist emailer and Tea Partier David McKalip. Kremer told the group: Hey All, Not to be a pain, but this is not Tea Party Patriots logo to change. This is FreedomWorks logo and they have said they are keeping the original design. I do not know why this discussion is continuing.
In 2004, Citizens for a Sound Economy was renamed FreedomWorks, while its affiliated Citizens for a Sound Economy Foundation became Americans for Prosperity (AFP). Since then the Koch brothers have given more than one million dollars to AFP. At an AFP rally in 2009, David Koch said "Five years ago, my brother Charles and I provided the funds to start the Americans for Prosperity, and it's beyond my wildest dreams how AFP has grown into this enormous organization." AFP is the political arm of the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, of which David Koch is chairman of the Board of Trustees.[Americans for Prosperity created Patients United Now, which advocated against a single-payer system during the 2009-2010 healthcare reform debate. Both FreedomWorks and Americans for Prosperity have provided support for the Tea Party movement.
I'm pointing out the fallacy that the OWS organization is anything but a political front, aimed at minimizing Democrat losses in the next election. Progressive strategists are jealous of the grassroots support the Tea Party has received and have thus created their own group to counterract and take some of the oxygen away from the TP.
It's no surprise why public sector unions immediately came under assault by new GOP governors in states like WI, NJ and OH after last year's election. As Governor Walker proved in WI after he gave $127 million in tax breaks to corporations - squandering the surplus his predecessor left him - and then not only demanded giverbacks from public sector unions - which they'd already agreed to do under the former governor - but gutted their ability to bargain for anything but pay raises that can't exceed the cost of living. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ALEC_Corporations The American Legislative Council or ALEC is where a lot of this legislation originates on the state level. Your can see corporate sponsors of ALEC in the link above. Again the Koch Bros now the second richest men in the US, are heavily involved in funding and organizing their activities. Below is s list of state legislators who are members of ALEC. http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=ALEC_Politicians From the above link: "Through ALEC, behind closed doors, corporations hand state legislators the changes to the law they desire that directly benefit their bottom line. Along with legislators, corporations have membership in ALEC. Corporations sit on all nine ALEC task forces and vote with legislators to approve “model” bills."
Uh, private sector unions chased jobs out of the USA and they also put their employers out of business, that's why their membership totals declined over the last several decades. Also, jobs that were traditionally unionized were susceptible to replacement by innovation. For example, the amount of labor required to build autos has fallen dramatically. Or consider CNC mills and lathes. It used to be that a machine shop required highly experienced journeymen to run mills and lathes. Now it takes far fewer people and those who operate the equipment don't need the same degree of expertise as before. Do you know the Navistar office in Warrenville? In the late 80s, the firm (which used to be called International Harvester). Was competing to build a new truck engine. They bought an expensive software package which could be used to design the engine and all its components, then produce the CAD/CAM and CNC output to be used to make the engine. Navistar had 50 unionized technical employees working on the project. The firm brought in 12 consultants from the software firm to teach them how to use the software. Those union workers refused to learn the new system. The 12 outside consultants ended up doing ALL the work over 5 years. Volvo got the engine contract. That's the type of thing unions did to American manufacturing.
That is true for businesses around the world. It isn't just the USA that uses China (and India, Malaysia, Indonesia, etc.) as their factory. It's businesses everywhere that do that. US manufacturing companies compete against foreign firms. Those firms use low-cost suppliers. If our companies were prevented from doing so, that would drive our companies out of business in a very short time. I do agree that China unfairly manipulates their currency. They also make it hard for us to sell some things to them. Both conditions should be addressed. One of the concerns over the bill is that it could start a trade war. I'm not sure that all other avenues to ameliorate the situation have been addressed - are you? You might care to acknowledge that Obama has not taken a position on the bill. With your rant on Boehner and Republicans, I appreciate the reminder that OWS really is partisan.
http://www.economicscenarios.com/public/pdfredir_sample.asp?issueNo=11 Note that it says, "Few Washington insiders truly believe such a Senate bill, even if it was passed, would be acted upon by the Administration."
Are you sure about that? "G-20 Sets Aside China Currency Concerns as Europe’s Debt Crisis Dominates" http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-15/g-20-sets-aside-china-currency-concerns-as-debt-crisis-dominates.html "The world’s leading economies set aside concerns about China’s currency for now as Europe’s debt crisis took centre stage at a Group of 20 meeting in Paris. G-20 finance ministers and central bankers refrained from ratcheting up their language on exchange rates in a statement yesterday, sticking to the line that they should be “market determined.” " Also consider this, from the same article: "Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner has been pushing China to allow its currency to strengthen, saying that would help support global growth, while avoiding actions that could cause friction with the world’s No. 2 economy and the second- largest U.S. trade partner. "
To assert that any political party or group is in tune with 99% of the country is absurd. That's the height of arrogance.
"G-20 finance ministers and central bankers refrained from ratcheting up their language on exchange rates in a statement yesterday, sticking to the line that they should be “market determined.”" Market determined means nations letting their currency float. The Europeans are agreeing with Geithner and the US senate. You do know OWS call themselves the other 99% don;t you? Most of what OWS wants are polices Democrats have supported and Republicans have stonewalled in congress. Democratic leaders have publicly supported OWS goals while Republican leaders have belittled them. This isn't so hard to understand is it?